Theosophy World — Home Page

txt/tw200209.txt (99 KB) XXXtwtw200209 Issue [HOME] [ONLINE ARCHIVES] [DOWNLOAD]

THEOSOPHY WORLD --------------------------------- September, 2002

An Internet Magazine Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy
And its Practical Application in the Modern World

To submit papers or news items, subscribe, or unsubscribe, write

(Please note that the materials presented in THEOSOPHY WORLD are
the intellectual property of their respective authors and may not
be reposted or otherwise republished without prior permission.)


"Lust for Living and Repentance," by B.P. Wadia
"Opportunities of Setting Our Feet on the Path," by G. de Purucker
"Kundalini Rising and Spiritual Enlightenment," Part II
    by Rick Nurrie-Stearns
"What Theosophy and Its Society Should Be," Part II
    by Madame Camille Lemaitre
"You Are A Mason," by Esme Wynne-Tyson
"Ethics and Human Behavior," by Steven Levey
"The Slave of the Lamp," by George William Russell
"The Spirit of Things," by Claude Falls Wright
"Apollonius of Tyanna, Part I, by Phillip A Malpas
"Eternity of the Waves," by James Neil Feinstein
"A Discussion on Rounds," Part I, by Boris de Zirkoff


> The LOGOS is said to be born only metaphorically, as the Sun is
> born daily, or rather a beam of that Sun is born in the morning
> and is said to die when it disappears, whereas it is simply
> reabsorbed into the parent essence. Cosmic PRALAYA is for things
> visible, not for the ARUPA, formless, world. The Cosmic or
> Universal PRALAYA comes only at the end of one hundred years of
> Brahma, when the Universal dissolution is said to take place.
> H.P. Blavatsky, THE SECRET DOCTRINE, II, page 69 fn.


by B.P. Wadia

[From THUS HAVE I HEARD, pages 257-59.]

The Will to live is a most tenacious power and manifests as the
Lust for Living, then as the Love of Life, and then as the Love
of Life Immortal. The great Buddha said that Tanha, the
unquenchable thirst to live, by the way of the senses, and by the
way of the mind, was a curse. Love for life created the fear of
death. The great teaching is given:

> Kill love of life; but if thou slayest Tanha, let this not be for
> thirst of life eternal but to replace the fleeting by the
> everlasting.
> Desire nothing. Chafe not at Karma, nor at Nature's changeless
> laws. But struggle only with the personal, the transitory, the
> evanescent, and the perishable.
> Help Nature and work on with her; and Nature will regard thee as
> one of her creators and make obeisance.

Man has debased the love of life into the lust for living. This
is more due to false knowledge than ignorance. Most suffer from
the lust for living. There is a struggle. While man craves to
satisfy the flesh, the Native Soul, awake in the innermost
recesses of his being, whispers, insists, when disregarded
torments and when submerged afflicts the carnal nature. Evil and
wickedness of sensuous life cause pain, decay, and death.

The passage from the life of greed, lust, and selfishness to the
True, the Good, and the Beautiful is forced upon man by the God
of Suffering, a servant of Yama, the God of Death and therefore
of Renewal.

The man who passes from selfishness and evil to the good life
experiences a clear perception of past errors and blunders.
Committed unconsciously and in ignorance, these appear not as
mistakes but as crimes and sins. He repents, but he repents in
ignorance, or, because he has only false knowledge, repents in a
wrong manner. The lust for living takes its revenge on him. It
tempts him to his fall. He does impulsively what he did not mean
to do. In its turn, this activates his conscience, which
sometimes assumes an exaggerated tone that confuses and torments
him. This is the stage of transition. Often it is long, lasting
for years.

If ignorance and false knowledge create sin, ignorance of the
modus operandi of the Law of Karma prolongs the period of
Repentance that leads to permanent cure. The period is shortened
by the blessed knowledge of Karma, which is just, and infallibly
so, but which also is merciful, inasmuch as it shows us how to
wipe out the evil effects of past misdemeanors and even of

This important theme is the basis of the remarkable new novel of
Sholem Asch. He deals with the important psychological problem
of sin and repentance in A PASSAGE IN THE NIGHT. The Voice of
Conscience neglected in the committing of blunders exaggerates to
the point of inducing morbidity and melancholia.

We draw the reader's attention to this novel. Below we quote a
few sentences to attract him to self-examination. Unconsciously
to himself, is he gliding into the sphere of sin? Aware of his
past blunders, is he repenting in the wrong way? What is right

Says Sholem Asch:

> Like you, I had to start earning my living early, and like every
> one of us, I encountered temptations and pitfalls. Well, I did
> certain things that I would certainly not do today. And yet, I
> don't let them tower up and overshadow my life.
> Human beings like to torment themselves in order to appease their
> conscience. Man's conscience has an enormous appetite; give it a
> finger, it will swallow a hand.
> Certainly one must repent, and determine not to sin again; but
> one must repent and dismiss the matter.
> With your concentration on your sin, you sin greatly against God.
> A man must not speak evil even of himself.

Sholem Asch does not give final or complete answers. His
prescription will lead to that Soul-Discipline which the Sages of
the Orient have always taught and teach today.

> Do not believe that one can ever kill out lust by gratifying or
> satiating it. This is an abomination inspired by Mara. It is by
> feeding vice that it expands and waxes strong, like to the worm
> that fattens on the blossom's heart.
> Kill in thyself all memory of past experiences. Look not behind
> or thou art lost.


By G. de Purucker


The human beings above us, I mean those who are the chelas of the
Teachers, and the Teachers themselves, and the Teachers of the
Teachers, are each one respectively a stage nearer than the
preceding class to that Divine, a degree or a step higher in the
Buddhic Hierarchy, in the Hierarchy of Compassion, of which we
have so often spoken before in these meetings under the Teacherís

Let us recollect that we are the outmost rank or ring of that
Buddhic Hierarchy of Compassion, and it depends upon each one of
us, not only upon the life that we live, but upon the ideas that
we hold enshrined in our minds and in our hearts, to how great a
degree we may become faithful transmitters and manifesters of the
divine streams from that supernal source.

When we can transmit these in their native crystalline purity,
when our minds become transmitters so limpid and clear, so high
in their aspirations and so unadulterated in their natures that
we can consciously receive and pass on these life-giving streams,
the streams of understanding from the fountain of the Universal
Life, then indeed we are saviors of men, saviors of our fellows;
and this is the goal to which our Teachers call us.

This is the end and purpose of our meetings here in this our
Temple of Peace in esoteric conclave, in order that, heart to
heart and mind to mind, we may draw closer together in bonds of
more strict and more stringent fraternal union, not merely
welcoming with arms outstretched and with the ancient kiss of
brotherhood the newcomers into our ranks, but by giving them an
example of what we have had the opportunity ourselves to obtain.

Thus are we exemplars of the lessons we have learned here and
through our aspirations and meditations in private; and thereby
we begin that noblest of duties, the saving of our fellows
through our own individual subordination to the laws of our Order
and Universal Brotherhood.

For after all, is not this aim the one which the Teachers have
told us is the lifework of themselves, and should be the lifework
of us at the present time, their chelas farthest from them? It
is. In some countries they speak of a Christ; in other countries
they speak of a Buddha; elsewhere they speak of one who has found
the Way, the Path, who has found Tao. And in each case the
reference is to one who has so completely subordinated his
individuality to the universe that he thereby becomes the
faithful transmitter of the spiritual life of which we have

All these various names and titles mean the same thing. What is
this meaning? It is that the mind and the heart, the
understanding and the consciousness, and therefore the example
and the life, are all at one, all in unity working along the same
pathway leading to the sublime goal at which we have hinted; and
this life so led brings not only to the heart of each one of us a
peace and a joy which pass all ordinary human understanding, but
it likewise enables us to give that peace and that joy to others.

It is through and by the lessons that we learn in our daily life
that come to us the opportunities of setting our feet upon this
pathway. As all of us know, who have been many years in the work
of the Theosophical Movement, under our three Teachers, H.P.
Blavatsky, and W.Q. Judge, and Katherine Tingley, the noblest
aim that we can have is to fit ourselves for this lifework.

Now, how is it done? Is it by looking for mere mysteries and for
weird tests and expected trials? What kind of a test or trial
should such be, at a time when one is wrought up to a pitch of
exaltation and high expectation so that in a certain sense he is
temporarily abnormal and therefore has a transitory, but
nevertheless an abnormal strength to meet such tests or trials?

Such would hardly be tests or trials at all and hence would be of
very little profit and very little worth. The testing comes in
the affairs of life that concern us daily, in the duties which we
perform faithfully or perhaps unfaithfully, in never leaving the
ranks for personal or selfish purposes; for here we are tested in
every part of our being, and at every moment, and in the most
unexpected and most unforeseen places, and at the most unexpected
and most unforeseen times.


By Rick Nurrie-Stearns (

[This article first appeared on PERSONAL TRANSFORMATION magazine's
web site. For more information see:

The author is a long-time student of Theosophy and past publisher
of that magazine. He is also the editor of the book SOULFUL
LIVING and had published the magazines THEOSOPHICAL NETWORK and

NOTES FROM MY JOURNAL (Written almost three years after the
initial experience.)

Physical Changes

When the energy rose in my body that night, it changed the shape
of my skull. Along the sagittal suture, a ridge formed in the
skull bone from the crown to the forehead. In the first several
months when I would sit in meditation, the skull would soften and
feel somewhat pliable like a young baby's head. The bone of the
skull would change shape with the ebb and flow of the energy.

I encountered my folks on my way to work one day. I mentioned my
experience of bliss and my skull changing shape. They looked at
me convinced I must have something serious wrong like a brain
tumor, thinking bliss abnormal. They convinced my wife, Mary,
that I should see a doctor.

After several days of nagging conversation, I agreed to see a
doctor just to settle their concerns and to clear up any thought
that that there maybe something physically wrong.

The doctor ordered a MRI and X-ray. Both showed no sign of
dysfunction. The nurse at the X-ray lab was most helpful in
commenting, "Honey, you are probably not going to find any
answers here."

Later, I found that acupuncture helped my body adjust to the
increased energy level. Physical labor and nature walks also
helped greatly.


Some days after the experience, I went through a period where I
grieved the death of what I was, the life that was lost. It was
as if I was grieving the death of a close friend, myself. The
grieving also felt rather odd as at the same time I *was filled
with joy.

Being the Road

Several days after the experience, I gathered up my courage to
drive into town to pick up mail at our local post office.
Driving a car with heightened awareness was a challenge. I found
my being aware of many things at the same time demanding. It
taxed my ability to drive.

Usually when I drive, I let go of awareness of certain functions
and operate more mechanically. That morning, everything stayed
present in my awareness. When something came into awareness, it
remained there.

When I got in the car, I felt the skin on my back touching the
shirt and seatback. I felt the sock on my foot as I pressed my
shoe against the gas. Driving off, I watched the speedometer, at
the same time, I felt my foot upon the gas pedal while keeping in
the proper lane, looking for traffic, and keeping in mind where I
was going.

I remained conscious of each additional ongoing experience, all
experienced simultaneously. It was a beautiful day with a clear
blue sky. I listened to the air as it passed by the open window
and felt the sun on my arm. Going 45 miles an hour was the best
that I could manage. There was so much to take in. Thankfully,
there were few cars on the road that day.

As I drove, everything became immediate. It all moved by as if I
were viewing many more frames per second than normal. I
particularly noticed the road ahead of me as I drove. I observed
the texture and color of the road, seeing how the light made the
asphalt shine a little.

While taking the whole driving experience in, I noticed cracks in
the road ahead. They formed a dimpled indentation, the
beginnings of a pothole. As I noticed them, I suddenly became
one with the road, loosing all awareness of everything else.
There was only road.

A moment later, I startled myself, remembering that I was driving
the car. Instantly, my consciousness snapped back to being in
the car and driving it.

The continuation of my car trip that morning was fraught with
tension as I fought to steady my awareness so I would not drift
into oneness with something else and crash.


Merging with the infinite had the definite experience of burning
away karma. Afterwards, the old desires, dislikes, and
obsessions no longer had impact on me. I found that they only
affected me if I consciously invested energy into them.


Some weeks after my awakening in my enthusiasm, I spoke with
family and friends about the experience. I quickly learned how
strong the tendency is in our society to make spiritual
experiences pathological. This seemed especially true when I
spoke to them about the experience of "no-self."

I was dumfounded by their reaction at first. What I experienced
was vastly more real and fulfilling than what I had previously
known in life. Yet, I was met with the look that there must be
something wrong with me, the look of disbelief.

Personally, I understand this doubt. In the past, I utilized
skepticism in my work as publisher. I read hundreds of stories
of personal transformation. Many sounded more like the
individuals had a mental breakdown than as though they had
experienced a breakthrough.

After the initial couple of months a friend, well-versed in both
eastern philosophy and western psychology, told me a Chinese
proverb. He said, "The difference between a wise man and a fool
is the wise man knows when to speak and when not to." After
hearing the proverb, I was more discreet about whom I spoke with
about my experience.


A month or two after my awakening, I discovered that I had
developed a morose persona to hide my buoyant joy and experience
of bliss. In masking my joy, I attempted to sidestep the
reaction of friends and family, whom saw it as pathological.
Being depressed or down is more accepted in society than being
light and buoyant.

I discovered that I had developed this persona one morning when I
was feeling completely distressed. I was behind in my
publication schedule and I had been unable to accomplish my work.
I sat down to think over my situation and worded my discomfort
back to myself. "I am distressed because I am completely
overwhelmed with joy and bliss and unable to work." As I worded
it out aloud it sounded so absurd that I burst out laughing at my
biggest complaint in life!

Joy and Bliss

It took time to relax into experiencing the increased energy,
joy, and bliss. As before, I had been content with less. After
the opening, I realized how many strategies I developed to lower
my energy level. In the past when my energy would start to go
up, I would eat, sleep, have sex, do physically demanding work,
stay up late, work longer, take hot showers, get moody, worry,
read, watch TV, etc.

It has been three years since the awakening and I have been in
near constant experience of bliss. In the first year after the
awakening, the bliss energy completely blew me away. At times,
it still washes me away. The experience of the energy washing me
away has significantly reduced. Now I can stay present with it
and not identify as much with the duality. (That is duality in
the sense that there is someone having an experience).

For the first two years after the awakening, the bliss energy was
most challenging to experience during times of extreme physical
pain, like when I hit my finger with a sledgehammer accidentally.
Over the last year, my experience has changed. I now experience
both bliss and pain at the same time. I found it is a matter of
where the attention resides. I admit the pain I experienced was
not of the magnitude of having my leg cut off or of someone
nailing me to a cross. I sense there is still much to integrate

Naming it

It was several months after the experience before I was able to
read again comfortably. During those early months, written
material was exceedingly difficult to decipher. At work, it was
taking me an hour to write a sentence. It took me less time to
read but still it was difficult to use that part of my brain.

When able to read again, I spent a considerable amount of time
studying books on consciousness and enlightenment in an effort to
understand my experience further. I also contacted several
spiritual teachers and authors for feedback.

The driving force for my search was to find out what to do. I
felt as if I had one foot in the mundane world and one in the
spiritual but that I was not fully in either. Even though part
of me knew everything was ok, another part felt shattered. I
also had an intellectual curiosity and need to name, understand,
and verify what it was I had experienced.

Being a publisher was a great help in contacting spiritual
teachers. Over the years, I had been in contact with several as
I published their works. The spiritual teacher that I felt most
connection to was from the Zen tradition. I felt immensely
helped by his ability to mirror back my state of consciousness
and to verify and confirm my experience of enlightenment.

In eastern spiritual terms, the experience of consciousness
without an object or subject is nirvikalpa-samadhi, meaning
enlightenment or nirvana.


By Madame Camille Lemaitre

[From a section entitled "Theosophical Activities" in the January
15, 1889 issue of LUCIFER, pages 429-435. H.P. Blavatsky and
Mabel Collins co-edited the magazine.]

With our present social organizations, say ten men die of hunger.
That is a trifle, for which the law of retribution will exact
payment from the organizers and leaders of men and society. That
does not prevent the globe's rolling on. What is of real serious
importance and a hindrance to the march of evolution is that,
through the faults of men calling himself or herself friends of
humanity, SOULS should wither and die from want or insufficiency
of nourishment.

Is it surprising that our world should advance so slowly? What
numbers of motive powers are unused, what numbers of beneficent
forces are left inactive from want of a fulcrum, from want of one
true datum which could serve as the starting point for a whole
series of actions that would strengthen the great movement of

I repeatedly begged the "Isis Branch" to work in this direction,
to print, for instance, the Abbe Roca's articles and your
luminous and crushing replies. Nothing is better calculated to
strike the mind of the French people and to assist it to find its
orientation than the work you have there done.

> Reference here is made to the late Isis, the Branch of the
> Theosophical Society in Paris, and a controversy in the LOTUS
> between the Abbe Roca and one of the Editors of LUCIFER.
> -- Editor of LUCIFER

The same remark applies to the letter published in LUCIFER to the
Primate of England. I should like to see it translated into all
languages and distributed in millions in all Catholic and
Protestant countries. Again, the same is true for THEOSOPHY OR
JESUITISM, which I translated for the LOTUS. How much good could
we already have done? So little concerned with propaganda has
"Isis" been that it has twice returned the subscriptions sent by
my husband and me. Thus, though we cannot accurse "Isis" of
having done nothing and kept the money, yet the last thing its
staff cared to do was to spread Theosophy broadcast.

What numbers of things might be used for the masses! Always on
our system of spreading on all sides the glad tidings, how much
The most fruitful source to draw from will be THE SECRET
DOCTRINE. For its spread, when translated, we regret that
ESOTERIC BUDDHISM has not been published. For France, its
translation would have aided the spread of the Theosophical
movement far more than that of the OCCULT WORLD. Such was
Dramard's opinion.

ESOTERIC BUDDHISM, its incompleteness notwithstanding, gives a
far better general idea of the Doctrine. All are of the same
opinion. It is necessary for our country to prepare the way for
THE SECRET DOCTRINE, which throws light on just those points left
in the shadow by ESOTERIC BUDDHISM, and amplifies its
explanations by the way in which it states the truth.

Let us return to our idea of propaganda, which I want to explain
to you thoroughly. I feel disgusted when I see that the
"Salvation Army" manages, penny by penny, to draw millions into
its coffers. It uses these millions to distribute bad tea,
rancid cakes, and poisonous doctrines, while sincere Theosophists
cannot manage to quit their own narrow circle and spread
everywhere the flood of saving truths, which they have received
for some time past.

To accomplish anything, we must understand each other. Should
that be so impossible among co-thinkers who preach only UNIVERSAL
BROTHERHOOD? Each should give financially, intellectually,
morally, and spiritually according to his means. An annual
subscription is a good thing, apart from the donations that those
favored by fortune can give. This is always on condition,
however, that for their few pounds the latter do not imagine that
they have the right to hamper everything by their narrow views,
their timid spirit, and their faint-hearted, mean-spirited, and
cowardly character.

Do not even disdain the poor man's farthing. On the contrary, a
great step will be made when "the widow" will have understood
that she can do no more useful work for Humanity than to give her
mite towards relieving the great burden of ignorance under which
that poor humanity is dying, whether clad in silken vesture or in
rags, marching under the banners of Religion, of Science,
Politics, and Society.

I say all this to you and you know it better than anyone does
since you are the mouthpiece of the Teachers who keep on
repeating it in their letters and writings. I only speak to you
thus at length of this mode of organization, which belongs to the
entirely practical domain, because such an organization tends to
beget consequences on the "spiritual plane."

I have one word more on this subject. Francois de Salles,
terrified at the progress of the Reformation, was seeking every
means to combat it. In his letters to the ecclesiastics and
bishops among his friends, he used to say, "Let us write Catholic
novels," and they wrote Catholic novels, and these novels were in
everybody's hands. They never ceased appearing except during the
First Republic. After that had been crushed by Napoleon I, a
revival of this kind of literature occurred, which became a
regular avalanche after Napoleon III had crushed, in his turn,
the Second Republic.

These books are everywhere today. They are in the libraries for
children and women. They form the basis of the communal
libraries and are still given as prizes in secondary schools.
Thus in spite of Voltaire and the free thinkers, or those who
think themselves so, "Francois" always wins the battle and
Catholicism still possesses, as in the past, the heart of the
woman. Through her, it holds the child and is master of the man,
however emancipated he may fancy himself.

It is true that those who destroyed had nothing to put in its
place. The soul's aspirations are no empty word. "Give us our
daily bread," is a prayer uttered with constancy worthy of a
better fate by these poor starving ones. "Give us our daily
bread," cry in the desert of life those who know not that this
bread is not something to give but must be earned, and that it is
in ourselves.

Poor humanity repeats on every note, "Give us our daily bread."
Some address themselves to the ministers of their religion,
others to the leading lights of science; these to the
philosophers, those to the politicians; these to the
sociologists, who are no better off, those to any charlatan who
claims TO KNOW.

Theosophy answers all desires and can fulfill all aspirations.
All these needy ones are ignorant of the existence of this wisdom
of wisdoms. It alone can restore strength, health, physical, and
moral peace to all these troubled, excited beings, exhausted by
centuries of political, economic, and religious despotism. It
alone can show to each man that he himself is the way, and that
in him alone are the truth and the life.

Let us then write Theosophical novels for the masses; i.e.,
novels in which, leaving aside the transcendental part of
occultism, we seek only to express and to render intelligible by
the action of the heroes the lofty meaning of its saving
morality. We thus inculcate into men's hearts its all-embracing

Let us write Theosophical novels, and if we know how, as
Moleschott says, always to respect the law of cause and effect in
the actions, the words, even the thoughts of the people we
introduce, those novels will be interesting as well as
instructive. The men will read them with pleasure, pleased by
their independent and manly tone. They will charm and move the
women by the sentiments they express and by their healthy
psychism. They will appeal to the children by their simplicity,
straightforwardness, and truth.

Is there anything we cannot do in this direction with the help of
the light that the esoteric doctrine throws upon man, the worlds,
life, and evolution in general? In the great humanitarian work,
each has his lot. The task given to me, to my Highest Self, is
to work thus, however difficult it may be. I throw my whole
heart into it, knowing that all that a man wills that he can do.

A little will is my only possession. With this little, I work
ceaselessly to learn so that I may be able to do things. This is
so I may be able to start as many Egos as possible upon the path
of final spiritual growth. By this reckoning, all healthy books,
which quicken good feelings in man or assist their development,
are books written with this end, even if unintentionally.
Tolstoy's Socialist novels, for instance, are thus theosophical
novels. The presence or absence of the word itself makes no

I see in the October Number of LUCIFER that some members of the
Theosophical Society desire to form "Lodges of Magic." Poor
things! What are they thinking of? They waste their time. If the
desire to progress on the spiritual plane torments them, let them
first render healthy the physical and moral atmosphere in which
they live to develop some spiritual faculties. To that end, let
them enlighten the whole, let them employ their strength, their
intelligence, their need of activity, THEIR MONEY, in pushing a
propaganda such as I propose.

They ought to have the means, these people whom the DEVIL TEMPTS
by suggesting to them thus to throw themselves haphazard, without
training, without preparation, into a path so dangerous, so
little trodden. Surely, the daily struggle for a livelihood must
be unknown to them. If they have leisure, let them help to teach
those who have none. It will be the first step on the road of

Adeptship, i.e., knowledge and the power it gives, is what turns
the heads of weak mortals and keeps them back from the goal for
long. In their haste, full of covetousness and egoism, they
completely lose their way.

For this reason in such novels as I suggest, it is not the Adept
in his power and glory that I would see represented. I see the
Adept unconscious even of being so, in course of preparation. I
see the Adept who WILL be, in his toilsome, difficult,
impossible, unceasing struggle against himself, against all the
evil and opposing wills, against all the elements. He struggles
against all the previous causes whose effects he has to destroy
by labors of which those of Hercules are only a pale symbol. It
is this Adept whom I would have shown in every phase of his
arduous ascent to fire men's souls and raise their courage.

What is true is touching. The Initiate or Adept is no myth. The
Mahatma simply IS. Edgard Quinet, in his splendid book CREATION,
wherein he thinks and has the intuition of so many truths about
evolution, states the fact as a self-evident truth, when he says:

> A soul that holds straight on to the highest point of human
> nature is upon the plane of universal nature; it finds the truths
> upon which the world rests. Before experience has torn them from
> him, Nature confides her secrets to the great and good man.

Let the Theosophists who want to found a lodge of Magic meditate
upon these words, and let them make themselves able to FIND the
truths upon which the world is based, and there will be no
further danger for them in gratifying their desire.

> It is to preserve Theosophists from such dangers that the
> "Esoteric Section" of the Theosophical Society has been founded.
> Its PRELIMINARY RULES and Bylaws prove that the way to the
> acquisition of occult powers and the conquest of the secrets of
> Nature leads through the Golgotha and the Crucifixion of the
> personal Self. The selfish and the faint-hearted need not apply.
> -- Editor of LUCIFER


By Esme Wynne-Tyson

[From THE ARYAN PATH, June 1951, pages 253-57.]

All reformers throughout the ages, from the first tent-planners
to Karl Marx, have looked on everything that man has made and
beheld that it was far from good. Whereupon they have labored at
blueprints for its betterment, altering here a style of building,
there a form of government or a financial system, and imposing
these upon their fellowmen by anything from force of argument to
bloody revolution. Only a few of their more enlightened critics
observe that PLUS «A CHANGE, PLUS C'EST LA MEME CHOSE; while
still fewer realize the implications of that observation.

The chief implication being that, fundamentally, nothing has ever
been changed by the most revolutionary of social reformers, for
the simple reason that they have always merely manipulated
effects, trying to put right this and that aspect of a world that
is rotten to its foundations. And, until this fact is perceived,
until the old foundations are abandoned and new ones established,
there will never be an essentially different world; arrows will
merely have given place to atom bombs, the Star Chamber to the
Gestapo, and the slave galley to the concentration camp. The
attitude of mind which made any and all of these things possible
remains unchanged by materialistic manipulation, however thorough
or widespread this may have been.

It is here that the spiritual seers of the ages have shown
themselves to be wiser and more realistic than the reformers; for
they have all taught that the world can never be better than the
individuals composing it. Every visible detail of civilization
is the direct result of the thought and ingenuity of some man.
Obviously, then, say the seers, if the world-visible is
imperfect, the imperfection lies in that which has projected it,
i.e., in the thinking of mankind. Therefore, true reformation
cannot be brought about by trying to improve and manipulate the
effects, but by purifying, reforming, spiritualizing the cause --
the thought behind the appearance.

And it is always from this point that the greatest Teachers have
started. From the Zoroastrian who warned, "Thou should not be
too much arranging the world; for the world-arranging man becomes
spirit destroying," to Jesus of Nazareth who taught that "the
Kingdom of God" (or the rule of universal harmony) "cometh not
with observation: neither shall they say, 'Lo here!' or, 'lo
there!' for, behold, the Kingdom of God is within you," all have
realized that there can be a regenerate world only when there is
a regenerate man, since the outward is forever a projection of
the inward.

But this, the one and only solution to the problem of life, has
always been considered altogether too hard a saying for the
majority of mankind, whose all-too-frail flesh shrinks from such
spiritual purgation; and so, through the constant rejection of
the cure, the disease has become worse and more deeply rooted,
until, in these days, the crisis has been reached, and mankind
must either suffer the purge -- or extinction.

The writer of the first chapter of Genesis postulated a Divine
Mason. He saw that if a wholly good Mind projected, or fathered,
a creation, that creation must be "very good." This elementary
logic seems always to have been taken into account on the highest
level of thought, and from this premise has been deduced the
conclusion that the visible world, with all its evident
imperfections, cannot be the world divinely based.

Unlike the reformers, the Seers have not flattered, or willfully
or ignorantly deceived, mankind by saying that everything would
be all right if this or that section of it would act differently,
or if this or that social reform or financial system could be
brought about; they have faced the situation squarely and
declared that the thinking and living of mankind as a whole is
false and deluded, and is therefore necessarily objectified in a
false and delusive environment.

But, although there are sometimes a few converts to this radical
point of view, humanity in general has turned in panic from the
thought of any essential VOLTE-FACE, and demanded some form of
compromise, usually in the shape of the teachings of an
established Church which takes the responsibility for salvation
upon itself and does not exact a too fundamental reorientation in
the lives of its members.

It harps on their frailty and helplessness and evolves theories
of vicarious atonement to be gained by the comparatively easy
means of loyalty to, and financial support of, the Church
organization. And, so deeply rooted is the fear of any radical
change of the status quo, that people will endure the greatest
possible tyranny and domination of the Church rather than suffer
the all-essential purgation. And so we find the Church and
priesthood of all creeds standing between the masons and the
ideal world that they alone can build; craven masons, they who
agree to this "protection" in order to evade their only reason
for living!

But there are a great number today, stirred by the terrible pass
to which mankind has been brought. They are not willing to
suffer this reactionary "protection." The need for building has
become too obvious and too urgent, and if they do not glimpse the
need for new foundations, they can still insist on new buildings
being erected on the old. They can follow the reformers even
though they reject the Seers, hence the outbreak of Communism and
all other forms of materialistic totalitarianism. At least our
modern ideologists see the need of doing SOMETHING about it; but
when that something is the wrong thing it only results in
confusion worse confounded.

About 400 years B.C., Plato, a great Master-Builder, called for a
spiritual Freemasonry to build a world on the lines of his
Republic. In detail this Republic was far from being the Ideal
State such as would have been conceived by, say, the consecrated
Buddhist or Christian; but it had one great merit. Its conceiver
clearly stated the way in which it -- or any still higher concept
of life -- might be built, or brought into being: by, and in, the
consciousness of the individual.

> You speak of the city whose foundation we have been describing,
> which has its being in words; for there is no spot on earth, I
> imagine, where it exists.
> No ... but perhaps it is laid up in Heaven as a pattern for him
> who wills to see and, seeing, to found a city in himself.
> Whether it exists anywhere or ever will exist, is no matter. HIS

Here not only is it clearly shown how the outward and visible
world is made by the quality of the inward and invisible man, but
the important and startling pronouncement is made that the Ideal
State already exists in Heaven; and that it has, therefore, to be
realized rather than made.

If Heaven has unfortunate, localized associations in many
people's thought, it may convey the idea better to say that,
inasmuch as we can conceive of perfection, that perfection
already exists if only as an ideal in thought. It has not to be
CREATED but brought forth into the visible, as has every idea
that has ever been externalized.

It is this that the materialist finds so difficult: a thing
exists for him only when he sees it expressed three-dimensionally
in some material form. He does not see that before anything --
airplane, church, or atom bomb -- is made visible. It must
clearly exist in every detail in thought. Otherwise, it could
never be objectified.

This is so in ordinary things and even certain in matters of
conduct. No man can be better than his highest concept of good,
and therefore until a perfect concept of the Good is maintained
in the consciousness of mankind, there can never be a perfect
man. And until a perfect world, governed by unerring, divine
Mind and influenced by perfect, Good-governed men is mentally
conceived, we shall never experience perfection or anything
approaching it.

For, owing to the limitations of materiality, the ideal always
exceeds the manifestation. The perfect airplane or motor-car
remains in theory and, because it does so, there are constantly
improved models in manifestation. In precisely the same way, if
the conception of the perfect Good and a perfect universe were
held in the world-consciousness, the outward manifestation would
be a constantly improving world, not an immediately perfect one.
But, without that conception, the world, though mechanistically
improving, is spiritually degenerating; for, in its capacity for
evil-doing, the atom bomb is a degeneration of the arrowhead or
the primitive axe, even as Hitler, in the vastness of his evil
conceiving, was a degeneration of Julius Cesar.

But, although Plato so clearly indicated the "means," his ends,
or his visualized Republic, were not ideal enough to ensure that
State depicted as "new heavens and a new earth." Gautama Buddha,
who is reputed to have lived a hundred years earlier than Plato,
could have provided him with a far more foundational and ideal
blueprint. And, 400 years later, there emerged from the Middle
East a Way of Thought that was primarily concerned with the
founding of a truly Ideal Kingdom.

It began with the statement of a prophet in Israel (known as John
the Baptist) that the Kingdom of Heaven was at hand. "At hand"
must certainly mean "available," "ready to be appropriated," to
become actual and practical. And this cry was taken up and
expanded by one Jesus of Nazareth and his followers. The
expansion consisted of the all-important localizing of this
Kingdom in the words, "The Kingdom of God is within you." (Luke
17:21.) Not, obviously, within the flesh-and-blood frame, but
within the consciousness of man wherein dwells all that we have
ever thought or experienced. This was at once the Gospel, or the
good tidings, of Christianity, and its challenge.

As a challenge, it is the greatest that has ever been or ever
will be given to mankind, for it demands nothing less than the
sacrifice, or the crucifixion, of the fleshly man and the putting
on of the spiritual concept of man, made in the image and
likeness of the Divine Mind. And, to reach this concept, every
experience symbolized in the life and actions of Jesus must be
ours, individually and collectively. That is the true meaning of
the Gospel of the Christ, the Messiah. It is the highest concept
of manhood, our salvation from the lower sense of manhood, the
carnal or fleshly man, the imperfect concept of man which appears
to those deluded by the five deceiving senses.

It is from this transformation or translation that the flesh
(which is to be sacrificed or given up) naturally shrinks. That
is why homo-sapiens, the man of thought, continues to suffer the
tortures of the damned within the limiting straitjacket of

This is the hard saying that has been taught by all the greatest
Seers of the ages, the saying that the churches have watered down
to the easy and acceptable demand for the denial of some of the
indulgences of the carnal self. They have never taught the true
self-denial, which is no less than the complete elimination of
the carnal self, the worthless or insignificance person, removing
all but the spiritual selfhood of man.

A few mystics have seen the necessity for this. The priests have
never come nearer than the futile persecution of the flesh, the
denial of the joy and fullness of life (which is the very reverse
of true self-denial, since joy belongs essentially to the
spiritual concept of man) and the flagellation and ill-treatment
of the all too long-suffering fleshly concept of man.

These methods have nothing to do with the True Masonry: the
building up in consciousness of a truly regenerate man, and,
through him, to found new heavens and a new earth wherein dwells

This is the call to every one of us. This is the "harvest" which
always finds laborers "few," but must now be gathered if mankind
is to survive. We must all know ourselves as Spiritual Masons;
all hold in consciousness the Ideal State ruled by Divine
Intelligence and strive to the utmost to be governed in all our
actions by the laws of Love. The Ideal State will arise only
from the consciousness and labors of regenerate Masons.


By Steven Levey

It is remarkable how children are raised to follow a body of
precepts on ethical living because of how conflicting the
opinions on what is ethical are in the world. The conflicts are
so extreme that they can lead to horribly violent acts.
Therefore it is unreasonable for the foundation of a child's
rearing to be based on learning the difference between right and
wrong. But it is so!

Every culture has a systematic approach to teach its body of
precepts under the guise of religion. Children are raised at
home, brought up with a religious education designed to insure
the ethics are not forgotten. Even if the precepts are
remembered in a dead-letter sense, they are still there.

What is right and what is wrong have been impacted to us as
children. How then do we have conflict as the norm rather than
the seeking of resolution? After thousands of years of human
culture, how can an ethical common denominator have eluded us?
How so to the extent that we are flying blind as far as
protecting ourselves from ourselves?

In the attempt to regulate human affairs politically and
socially, there will be times when one culture or group will
offend another. All too often, an individual has offended
another with huge consequences. Knowing this, we should not
wonder at the cause of conflict.

The cause of conflict is obvious. The wonder is that we are too
willing to forgo our childhood ethical up-bringing. Granted,
children do not face the complicated issues of the adult world.
They do not face the same responsibilities and consequences for
their decisions. But should we let our facing the adult world
change what is right and wrong for us?

Why do we lose our ethical values? It is not because of a change
in our sense of what is right and wrong. We are unable to act
ethically. Before we explore why, consider the accepted grounds
of human behavior. Consider what our culture sees as acceptable

Most justify their inharmonious actions saying people are
naturally driven by base survival instincts. The Orthodox
Christian doctrine of original sin gives further power to this

From the evolutionist perspective, there is a violent rational
for our actions. It comes from the belief that we evolved out of
the sea into land animals, monkeys, and finally up from all fours
into human stature, crude communities, and then cities.

What remains is the survival instinct. Out of it, the fittest
will be on top, having stepped on all that might impede them.
This is not judgmental. It is the creed of the self-made man of
the twenty-first century. Regardless of what they profess, the
majority live as if they have but one life. The so-called
fittest believe they have one life to do what needs to be done.
Is this frustrating to the rest of us? Definitely!

How did the humanity of today arise? There are two ways to
understand how it might have evolved.

The first approach assumes that the connectivity between us is
through a gene pool. It has been altered in some definite manner
to reflect the change of our awareness. This assumes that
consciousness is the basis for genetic alteration.

Some may insist that the alterations are made simply through
physiological changes in human habit. To them, we are more
upright than our supposed monkey ancestors only because we stand
more often for various reasons.

For whichever reason, we make the necessary alterations in our
genes through the instantiation of precisely the required changes
in that life. Those alterations are passed down through the
generations. Over a long time, we have arisen as humanity. Of
this ancestry, a clear stream of genetic evidence must exist.

What is important in one's life may differ with each of us.
Across the board, we all want success. Happiness rates a strong
second. Ironically, that happiness may become our primary
concern when we do not succeed. We might insincerely say to
ourselves, "It is not winning that is important. It is how we
play the game." If nothing else, we are great rationalists. In
our own eyes, we survive.

Most are not as successful in today's terms as those tenacious to
be on top. There are evolutionary changes required to get us
from the trees to Madison Avenue. If it left to the majority,
the genetic changes to bring this about would never have

Science grants no apparent connection between any of us but our
parents and their interconnections. How else are we to think?
Granted, all children have parents and all parents had parents.
Is there anything for us to consider? Does our choice of actions
affect our genetic makeup and that of our descendents? Is it
enough to just have been born? That is all that the majority of
us have accomplished.

Because of the common viewpoint, most communicate poorly and
accomplish little. We are haphazardly connected. How do we
insure the progress of humanity? Do the few make all the genetic
changes required of the many? Does this come out of their need to
be the fittest?

This takes us to the second approach to the evolution of
humanity. I find it the most interesting. Individuality is a
two-sided sword. Our uniqueness cuts us away from each other.
It also affords us the opportunity to become what we will.

Many settle for conformity. They accept the public outlook and
local religion. Even so, there is still a great need to be
individual, welling up continuously. That need cannot be
stifled. Out of the struggle between laziness and the need to
act on one's own behalf, one succumbs to various psychoses. The
struggle can be so great that one is left with little concern for
the welfare of others.

There are great philosophies, including Platonism, Buddhism,
Kabbalism, and Christian Mysticism. There are great writings by
Emerson, Kant, Spinoza, and Theosophists such as H.P. Blavatsky,
William Quan Judge, and Robert Crosbie. All are theosophical in
how they keep alive in the minds of men the authentic intentions
of the Wisdom Religion out of which all religions originate.

These philosophies and philosophers all support a key concept
that reconciles the problem of human evolution. It is the idea
of the Monad. The Monad is our pure individuality, existing
metaphysically for us as the core of our beings. Considering
this, H.P. Blavatsky brings the writings of Leibniz to our

There is an urge we feel. These philosophies point us towards
realizing it. We seek our ultimate pure individuality. That is
our Monad. It reflects all of nature in itself and from itself.
From a different point of view, it includes all other Monads in
itself. It has that connectivity because each reflects all the

In his MONADOLOGY, Leibniz responds to this urge to seek our pure
selves. He tells us that the concept of the soul is inherent in
religion and he gives it added life. It also enlivens psychology
as well, because it shows that our behavioral difficulties arise
from an ignorance of our true nature.

Any practice of separatism causes pain, being a lie within the
soul. It is like a parent rejecting some of its children. This
is the basis for "The Great Dire Heresy of Separatism" of

This realization is a panacea, a remedy that heals all. It is
not a mere concept for the curious few while the many are left
with a dead-letter religion. As H.P. Blavatsky says, "This is
the birthright of Humanity."

When taken seriously, these ideas penetrate the personality like
leavening in dough. They bring about fermentation and lightness.
The process is initially unpleasant because it brings on a
psychological revolution. At first, the polar opposites react
upon the new ideas of connectedness and responsibility. Those
who have gone on before have said that the strength of our
resolve will be tested!

How do we connect to our evolution and errant sense of ethics? It
proposes that each as Monad (or Soul) is our own ancestor. Born
repeatedly, we are the cause of our own evolution. Each is born
with an aspect of his highest, truest Self, the cause of his
ethical capacity.

The Latin term "virtue" means power of the Soul. That points to
an inherent discrimination of right from wrong of which we have
become inattentive. The Soul is our North Pole. We have become
addicted to the power of the South Pole. It comes from
personality, which tends to create separation and its needs to
support that which is inherently untrue about itself.

Within the makeup of the Monad is Atman (our universal soul),
Buddhi (universal compassion), and Manas (pure intellection).
This higher aspect of Manas is different than our personal mind,
which is selfish and egocentric.

In individual evolution, the natural tendencies must conform to
our Spiritual Nature. We cultivate a sense of wholeness, a
feeling of belonging to that which we can never be apart.
Qualities inherent to the nature of the Soul become part of our

There is a triple evolution within each of us. (1) The moral
evolution comes out of Atman, our pure spiritual nature. (2) The
evolution of wisdom and compassion comes out of Buddhi. (3) The
intellectual evolution comes out of Manas, which encompasses the
qualities of mind including intellection and introspection.
These are time-honored terms in various Eastern systems using the
Sanskrit language. These three lines of evolution are
accompanied by attendant lines of karma.

The triple evolution has its corresponding genetic effects,
leading to physiological changes over time. At each birth, we
begin with an inner nature having moral, psychological, and
mental qualities through which we can experience that life and
improve ourselves.

The complexities of this are daunting. At first, they may seem
unnecessary. Think this out carefully and you will come to agree
with our fathers of philosophy. Making our greatest concern the
welfare of others, we learn our strengths and weaknesses. Doing
so, the ethical alloy of the inner man replaces the dross of the
superficial personality. We are left with bodies of finer
material, more malleable to use in future incarnations. We make
ourselves fit to keep company with those whose duty is to assist
humanity in its struggle.


By George William Russell

[From THE CANDLE OF VISION, Chapter III, pages 15-18.]

Because I was a creature of many imaginings and of rapid
alternations of mood, there came to me the assurance of a truth,
of all truths most inspiring to one in despair in the Iron Age
and lost amid the undergrowths of being.

I became aware of a swift echo or response to my own moods in
circumstance that had seemed hitherto immutable in its
indifference. I found every intense imagination or every new
adventure of the intellect endowed with magnetic power to attract
to it its own kin. Will and desire were as the enchanter's wand
of fable. They drew to themselves their own affinities.

Around a pure atom of crystal, all the atoms of the element in
solution gather. In like manner, one person after another
emerged out of the mass, betraying their close affinity to my
moods as they arose.

I met these people seemingly by accident along country roads. I
entered into conversation with strangers and found they were
intimates of the spirit. I could prophesy from the uprising of
new moods in myself that I, without search, would soon meet
people of a certain character, and so I met them.

Even inanimate things were under the sway of these affinities.
They yielded up to me what they had special for my eyes. I have
glanced in passing at a book left open by some one in a library,
and the words first seen thrilled me, for they confirmed
knowledge lately attained in vision. At another time, a book
taken down idly from a shelf opened at a sentence quoted from the
Upanishads. Then unknown to me, these scriptures sent my heart
flying eastward. It answered a spiritual problem that I had been
brooding over an hour before.

Hardly a week after my first awakening, I began to meet those
whom were to be my lifelong comrades on the quest. Like me, they
were in a boyhood troubled by the spirit. I had just attempted
to write in verse when I met a boy whose voice was soon to be the
most beautiful voice in Irish literature.

I sought none of these out because I had heard of them and
surmised a kinship. The concurrence of our personalities seemed
mysterious. It seemed controlled by some law of spiritual
gravitation, like the law by which in the chemistry of nature
makes one molecule fly to another.

I remember the exultation I felt with my realization about life.
As Heraclites said, life was in flux. In all its flowing, there
was meaning and law. I could not lose what was my own. I need
not seek, for what was my own would come to me. If any passed,
it was because they were no longer mine.

One buried in a dungeon for many years could not have hailed
sunshine, the sweet-smelling earth, and the long hidden
infinitude of the skies more joyously than I did the melting of
that which had seemed immutable.

It is those who live and grow swiftly, and who continually
compare what is without with what is within, who have this
certainty. Those who do not change see no change and recognize
no law. He who has followed even in secrecy many lights of the
spirit can see one by one the answering torches gleam.

When I became certain of this, I accepted what befell me with
resignation. I knew that all I met was part of me. I knew that
what I could not comprehend relates by affinity to some yet
unrealized forces in my being.

We have within us the Lamp of the World. Nature, the genie, is
Slave of the Lamp. Nature must fashion life about us as we
fashion it within ourselves. What we are alone has power. We
may give up the outward personal struggle and ambition. If we
leave all to the Law, nature will pay us all that is rightly

Man becomes truly the Superman when he has this proud
consciousness. No matter where he may be, in what seeming
obscurity, he is still the King, still master of his fate. As he
is mighty or is humble in the solitude of his spirit,
circumstances reel about him or are still.

We are indeed most miserable when we dream we have no power over
our circumstances. I account it the highest wisdom to know there
is no destiny in the living universe than that we make for

How the spirit kindles and feels its power! Outwardly quiet, it
can see the coming and going of life, as it dilates within itself
or is still. Then do we move in miracle and wonder. Then does
the universe appear to us as it did to the Indian sage who said
that to him who was perfect in meditation all rivers were sacred
as the Ganges and all speech was holy.


By Claude Falls Wright

From THE PATH, November 1894, pages 250-53.]

"Ideas rule the world," quoted one of those whose influence in
the Theosophical Society is not the less felt because its source
is unperceived by most members. Yet there are many, even among
our own Theosophists, who hold tightly to the notion that the
world is held and even advanced by forms and words. From the
ritualism and ceremonies of the Priesthood to the carefully
rounded phrases of a Chesterfield there is scarcely a step. Both
are equally useless to the development of the real man. The
effort of each leads men away from the contemplation of the
Spirit to the adoration of matter.

Humanity has ever been led away from its freedom and recognition
of the eternal principle of Life, to make obeisance to the god of
form -- and matter! Those in the past who said that all
objectivity was Maya or illusion spoke a truth which must vibrate
throughout all time, reverberating through the hearts of all who
develop to the life of independence and power. For assuredly
none can limit the changes in the Great Breath, whose perpetual
motions in the unseen world make the varieties in this.

It is worthwhile to recognize this as a philosophy, and so
prevent many mistakes. The world pulls this way and that,
seeking her freedom in legislature and habit, oblivious to the
fact that it is precisely these things which forge her chains.
Belief in the necessity for Custom and Convention, sovereigns and
saviors, and style and good usage are really born of the
soulless. These all limit freedom of the Spirit and propose to
chain it to one idea. Hence arise disputations, and from them

Yet even recognizing this, the philosopher will not rebel against
them nor seek their immediate destruction. Emancipated, in the
world though not of it, he will see that the world being held by
forms, and that through them it must be aided and advanced to

Some will think it is going too far to say that the spirit of
evil and stagnation is in form. But it is easy to demonstrate
this truth. Every great leader, every genius, has thrown off the
yoke of form-slavery, drawing his principles of action from the
free source of things. Though often disregarding and destroying
things men have long believed dear and sacred, yet while he lives
men follow him and love him. Recognizing something of the
heavenly power about him, they find strength in his freedom and
delight to be in his presence and to know his thoughts. Who has
not seen the spirit of life in a child? And there are none among
us who upset customs more than children.

Buddha, Jesus, and the true religious founders destroyed all
forms. Even though we see in them the great originators of
present religious forms, it is not because they desired the forms
that they should be so. Their ideas and wisdom were clothed in
matter by their followers, who, possessing little recognition of
the Spirit, were incapable of drawing life from anything but

Poets and painters, musicians, geniuses of all kinds, are noted
for their eccentricities, yet no one can doubt that they see
deeper into the divinity of things than do the Philistines.
Strange as it may seem, it is, after all, the power of
ORIGINALITY which is indicative of possible progress in any human
being. Without this the nature is in darkness. There is no
light in it and no creative power.

The Theosophical Society was established on such a basis that
should prevent, if possible, it ever being tied by forms. Yet
how many there are who want to make it a RESPECTABLE institution!
They will not help a brother unless he is of the same rank as
them! How many, indeed, wish that HPB had not had eccentricities
or had not done so much outwardly to vibrate and shock
conventional shells. How many wish that fewer uneducated persons
were in the ranks and more of those who are book-learned and well
placed in Society!

Others are so caught in the web of form that they think it
impossible for anyone to possess wisdom or light outside the
Society's ranks. Let such know that there are many persons all
over the world, outside the Theosophical Society, who have caught
something of the Spirit of Wisdom just now lighting up the whole
earth. These as well as Theosophical Society members are surely
being helped by the Great Brotherhood behind.

The Theosophical Society has its own work to do. It was the
originator of these thoughts in the West. Through its members
they must be given to the world. And if taken up and used by
others outside, a part here and a part there, sometimes
imperfectly, generally unacknowledged, it is no harm, but always
unconsciously aiding the world. There are no forms here, no
priesthood. Each one has a personal wisdom and should hasten to
let the world know of it.

It is not only the Theosophical Society we work for, as a Society
merely. This is a great danger to be avoided. It is for the
Society only as a useful vehicle of ideas that we labor. It will
fade and fall to pieces sometime. Let us trust it may be
destroyed long before it approaches the possibility of creating
any priesthood within itself. The ideas the world and our race
have received through it will live and will have molded the
thought of the people almost without their knowing it. We shall
be forgotten, but the thoughts we have passed on will live.
Members should recollect they are not building an institution,
but only erecting a temporary structure in which a little wisdom
has been stored.

Many in the Society are just now used by those "behind the
scenes," to become vehicles of truth. They are intended to hand
it on. Once the brain has opened to the Light only one thing can
again close it, that is, the KEEPING BACK OF WISDOM FROM OTHERS.

Many receive knowledge in a flash of intuition, and instead of
giving it out at some Branch meeting or to someone who may need
it, they keep it hid away to burst it forth later in a
carefully-written paper or lecture, so that they may receive
credit for their ideas and not have them stolen by others
beforehand. Their ideas will then find no ground in which to
take root. They should have been given out when received. In
time, such persons will, if this habit be kept up, lose the
spiritual power they now possess.

The setting free of ideas in the world at the right moment has a
great deal to do with the development of occult powers, however
little connection between these two matters there may seem to be.
It is pure personality and selfishness that make one hold back
and wait until the thoughts can be given out with greater credit
to one.

Madame Blavatsky launched her wisdom into the world without any
consideration of herself. Probably her thought was something of
this nature: "I know my English is faulty, I know my science is
not of the best, but my wisdom is true, and it must be sent
forth. Others will steal my ideas and knowledge for their own
glorification, but it does not matter, that is their own loss.
They are also helping me in my labor. "

So it is that work which must be done, and speedily lest we lose
the knowledge ere we have penned it. Let loose the ideas among
the people. Do not hold them till you can get glory by them. Do
not wait until you can understand Sanskrit, can write classical
English, and have made a name for yourself in the world before
you become a worker.

This is all fear of form. To be sure, the better the instrument
the better the work, but the means must not be mistaken for the
end. The time is short. Only a few more years exist for active
work. Let the ideas loose in the world at all costs. It does
not matter at what loss of fame to you. After all, on your
deathbed you will know that it is the IDEA -- spiritual or
otherwise -- of life that you have had, and your virtue, that are
the important things, not how much you have known of other men's
thoughts, or how correctly you have dressed.

The Ideas live and rule, not the words that clothed them nor the
imagery used for their expression. And it is well known that he
who thus impersonally acts comes more and more directly in
relationship with the Brotherhood of Light.


By Phillip A Malpas

[The following comes from a series that appeared in THE
THEOSOPHICAL PATH, under Katherine Tingley as Editor and
published at the Point Loma Theosophical Community. It later
appeared in book form under the title TRUE MESSIAH: THE STORY AND
WISDOM OF APOLLONIUS OF TYANA 3 B.C. -- 96 A.D., published by
Point Loma Publications.]


Who and what was Apollonius of Tyana? In plain language he was
the spiritual mainspring of the first century A.D. for Greece
and Europe, immeasurably the greatest man of the years that
covered Roman history from the days of Augustus to the death of
Domitian and after. He lived from the time assigned to the birth
of Jesus to 96 A.D. and a little beyond, perhaps passing the
goal of a century of mortal years and living through the reigns
of twelve Roman Emperors.

Why was he the greatest man of the time? Because he was the
spiritual center of the western world; and as spirituality
surpasses intellect more even than intellect does brute force, so
his greatness surpassed that of all his contemporaries. The fact
that intellect and the animal power of militarism are more
spectacular and better advertised has nothing whatever to do with
the matter. Nor does it matter in the least that spiritual power
to very many may be a vague sort of term that means anything or
nothing. If today it is not understood as a real thing, then it
will be someday. Enough that there are always some who have it,
and always some who understand it.

The difficulty for the historian is that a spiritual character
usually loves the utmost privacy, and if some few facts of his
life become public, it is somewhat rare to find anything of his
personality in history. Often he is but a name, though fragments
of his thought and teachings may last through the ages.
Precisely this would have been the case with Apollonius had not a
group of mystics under the Empress Julia Domna, wife of Septimius
Severus, the Emperor so well known in Britain, gathered
information about him and edited and published the diary of his
Assyrian disciple, Damis. There is reason to believe that this
diary or history, as edited, has a double signification, being on
the one hand a plain narrative with some few rather far-fetched
and seemingly absurd passages, and on the other a mystical and
symbolical history in which the much-derided absurdities are
often a kind of code or cipher linking the disjointed portions of
the complete plan, or disguising in technically mystic language
things of a nature private to the mystic and forbidden to the

Indeed, there is nothing to prevent Philostratus from using the
well-known philosophical method of narrating historical facts
with a secondary (or primary) symbolical meaning, plain to the
students of his school, but to the profane, a mere "mythical"
anecdote. The method is not unknown in our own day, and if some
ancient histories were read in the face of this fact, there would
be found more sense in the 'fables' with which those histories
are loaded.

Needless to say, this edited and abridged history, based on the
translation of the Rev. Edward Berwick, is merely a narrative
and a record of teachings. For the complete work, and a
scholarly translation of the book by Philostratus, nothing can be
better than that of Conybeare. Our own aim and purpose, and our
only contribution, is to present the simple narrative and the
philosophy that has been given to the public in a short and
readable form, for the use and pleasure of those who cannot delve
into the Greek and do not wish to make the task of reading the
history of Apollonius too long. In these days of personality
worship, it may be necessary to say that the philosophy of
Apollonius is the important thing, while his personality is

As we progress in our narrative, it will be convenient to give a
few quotations from contemporary literature, although nothing new
or of import about Apollonius has hitherto been given to the
public except for the valuable comments of H.P. Blavatsky. We
mention her because, as students of Theosophy know, she had
access to records of the school of philosophy to which Apollonius
belonged, and what she says may be relied upon. In ISIS UNVEILED
and in THE THEOSOPHICAL GLOSSARY, she mentions one or two
interesting matters.

We turn now to the year 210 A.D. The Roman Emperor, Septimius
Severus, was a man well known in Britain as a soldier and
governor, and his reputation for study was widespread. Quite
likely he was an occult student who, as all students must, kept
his researches to himself, if they are not to cease to be occult.
Or, possibly, he was merely a dabbler in occult arts, such as are
common enough at all times, but there is a balance in favor of
his being connected with the more serious pursuit of occultism.

The popular description of such a man was quite as usual. The
in the terms one might expect. He says that Septimius Severus
was passionately addicted to the study of magic and divination,
and besides the study of the interpretation of dreams and omens,
was perfectly acquainted with the science of judicial astrology.
What other description of his studies would be likely to pass
current in the public gossip of the time?

Of the Empress, Julia Domna, it is said, "she applied herself to
letters and philosophy with some success and great application;
and was the patroness of every art and the friend of every man of

Septimius Severus had been on the throne of the Caesars since the
year 194 A.D. With him the western world entered the last
septenary of the "last quarter of the century" during which, we
are told by H.P. Blavatsky, an effort is made to enlighten a
portion of that western world with Eastern wisdom. The
Eleusinian mysteries, or their shadow, still existed, but there
was not very much life left in them. Queer things had been
happening in Alexandria with the 'Jewish superstition.' People
who ought to have known better, such as Origen and Clement, are
reproached by Porphyry (i.e. "Purple") for breaking away from
their philosophy derived from Ammonius, and, as it were, selling
it to Christianity, whereas Ammonius himself had been born of
Christian parents and had abandoned that teaching. Persecutions
had been rife and martyrdoms common at that very time. Precisely
what passed for Christianity at that date would be difficult to
define today. Even our histories of the period in this matter
are 'arranged.'

If we let our imagination run a little, we may almost perceive
something in the nature of an esoteric school of philosophy at
the court, Julia Domna, the learned Empress, being prominently
connected with it. We may at the same time sense a
counter-influence which must have attained no little force to
have raised its head so high as to have taken the methods of the
Neo-Platonist school of Alexandria and carried them into the
opposition camp, or at any rate grafted them onto the rival
traditions, as Porphyry declares. However that may be, we are
not concerned with it at the moment. If our imagination is not
at fault, however, we have a picture of the Empress as the
central star of a galaxy of learning at the court, with a strong
bias in favor of the good old philosophy, now so much corrupted
with all sorts of innovations.

It might not even be going too far to suspect that her school was
the lineal descendant of the famous esoteric school of philosophy
which adorned and illumined Ephesus exactly a century before,
when the clash and cacophony of strange doctrines was not so
strident and insistent in the Empire.

Already, we must suppose, the consolidating plastic mass of the
new literature would be following closely the trend of the
philosophies which went into its make-up of strange echoes of the
mysteries, incidents in the lives of their adepts, the
materializing of their allegories, the modernizing of their
ancient parables, and adaptation of traditional histories to
recent dates. Origen and Clement were really learned men who had
drunk at the fountain of the Neo-Platonic school of Alexandria;
but they had both of them thought it policy to go bodily with
their learning over to the rising school of Christianity. It is
quite possible that they did this at first with the idea of
preserving what they could of the old philosophy in the coming
storm, but it may have been cowardice, failure, desertion,
ambition, or any one of the strange motives that impel even
initiates of such a school to unexpected actions. The point is
that they did it.

What more natural then, than that their traditions, allegories,
rituals, and others of other schools should be made to act in a
similar manner and be transferred to the new schools? We may look
upon it as a barefaced robbery. But to them it was a merit to
build these old stones in the new edifice, just as a cathedral
has been injected in later centuries into the middle of the
forest of columns of the mosque of Cordova. Those who did it
thought it a worthy action.

The quiet school around the Empress Julia Domna could not but be
aware of these little tendencies. Their system and plan were
fairly safe from spoliation because they kept it to themselves,
or at least disguised it in allegory and symbol, the more
effective for being in outward appearance very simple and
commonplace narrative and fable, though some of the deeper
teachings were concealed under the strange jargon of the
alchemists, as they had been for millenniums past.

Yet the signs of the coming break-up were not wanting. What
could they do to meet the tidal wave that threatened to overwhelm
them? Their esotericism would die out and with it their
tradition, if it were not to be preserved in some outward public
form. Already it was being nibbled into by the mice of the
disintegrating sects that were growing up around them.

Obviously, a book must be written, half-revealing,
half-concealing what they would preserve. As to the kind of
book, there could be little doubt that a narrative, a biography,
would be most suitable. It would arouse no great disputations or
weird interpretations, yet it could contain all they needed to
say. What more appropriate than a life of the great Apollonius
who had passed away precisely a century before, after a career of
sanctity and purity known the world over? They had access to the
diary of his Assyrian pupil and companion, Damis, and such other
documents as were available. Likely enough these were among the
archives of their community, but it was sufficient for the
outside world to know that the learned empress "collected them."
They were crude though voluminous, and needed editing. In other
words, they needed arranging so as to contain within the body of
the narrative and discourses the inner body of the teachings and
the philosophical system. This arrangement required skill and
art, and the right man was found for the purpose in Flaccus, or
Flavius Philostratus, son of Verus, who had once taught rhetoric
at Athens, and was known for his speeches and tracts. His
eloquence was such that he was known as the 'Sophist' among the
group around the Empress.

If he was not a secret Pythagorean, he knew enough of the system
to do his work thoroughly. For Apollonius was a Pythagorean in
the double sense that he first followed the rule of Pythagoras
and then became a direct pupil of the Indian School of Philosophy
to which Pythagoras had belonged as a pupil before him.


By James Neil Feinstein

I see a vision in a crystal wave,
Shimmering cave of liquid glass.
Crashing waves on eternity's shores,
Bathing sand with sweet, white foam.

A vision in a hollow wave,
Those traveling swells
Traversing across the sea;
Gulls screaming in the sun.

Gallant armies clashed
On the shores of ceaseless waves.
Frigid water soaking through boots,
Trudging forward in the sand,
Only to be butchered by the faceless
Enemy on the silent bluff.

The waves were transparent and green,
And then bloody red of dying men
From the Trojan Wars to Tripoli.
Waves were there and crashed in bloody
Protest, but only the men on shore
Knew the price to be paid.

Men who knew not the eternity
Of the waves. But I knew.

I see a vision in a crystal wave
Of gasping men on foreign shores
Floating head down in shallow water
Pounded by the knowing waves,
Waves that pound on dead men or
Seaweed just the same.

A vision in a wave lasts but a moment
Before the sun ducks behind a yellow cloud.
The wind blows in from the west
And waves crumble before my eyes,
Leaving nothing but the flat sea
And a feeling of melancholy pounding
In my veins.

From the Trojan Wars to Tripoli,
The waves of eternity pounded
Unyielding, unprotesting, repetitious,
Like the dying of bleeding men.

When winds blow, waves crumble.
I turn back from the sea, leaving waves
And dead bodies of the past to rock
One another to sleep.

The sun sets leaving the beach empty;
The gulls have flown elsewhere for shelter.
Nothing remains but the waves pounding in
Nature's rhythm with the throbbing sea.


By Boris de Zirkoff

[This talk comes from the first part of a tape recording entitled
"A Discussion on Rounds" made of a private class held on June 8,

It is nice to consider worthwhile, noble, and elevating subjects
quietly. The get-togethers have an objective, our study of the
Ancient Wisdom. From another angle, having an objective sounds
odd. We are earnest students. When we get together, our
meetings do not have to have a particular objective since the
search for truth motivates us.

Our meeting together is hardly an objective in itself. It comes
from a dedication of search and thinking. Gathered as earnest
seekers, we generate a combined force. It is of benefit to all
present, even those not opening their mouths at all. Just
getting together with a spirit of dedication to search for
spiritual realities, we already generate force. It is not just a
force between us, but also unquestionably one going out and
benefiting others unbeknownst to them.

First, consider one aspect of the Rounds. In each Round, we
populate the earth Globe-by-Globe. In this Round, we have gone
through the process on Globes A, B, and C. We are down to Globe

We perform the same circulations in an individual lifetime. An
incarnation ends and we pass into a passive state. Between
successive incarnations as a human being, we alternate between
embodied existence and the devachanic sleep. When the time comes
to become active and incarnate again, do we come straight to
Globe D or do we start at Globe A? Do we jump into existence on
Globe D right out of some subjective state?

The answer is no. Without exception, all entities have to use
existing channels or pathways. The circulations of the universe
follow certain definite lines. This includes the visible and
invisible, things of all natures including the material, psychic,
astral, intellectual, and spiritual.

By analogy, we say they are as definite as the rivers of earth,
the channels followed by trade winds, and the paths followed by
cyclones. Every continent has its own paths over which storms
always move. It is just as definite with the oceans, where we
have mapped the various currents to a considerable extent.
Rarely do they change. When they do, they change the weather.

The circulations of the inner world are just as definite. In
order to enter into the planetary chain, you have to enter
through its openings. In order to enter into a Globe of the
planetary chain, you have to enter through its openings as well.

There are the unmanifest Globes, the upper five of the twelve.
HPB hardly mentions them in THE SECRET DOCTRINE. Disregarding
them, we speak of the manifest seven, Globes A to G. In every
case, the entrance into the planetary chain is through Globe A.
This is true whether it be a life-wave, the beginnings of a Root
Race on a Globe, or the entrance into incarnation of a being,
human or otherwise.

For the present, Globe D is our main abode. This is our central
gravity for millions of years. Before anyone can embody here, he
must pass on his downward arc from the Devachanic condition into
the embodied condition. This downward journey passes through
Globes A, B, and C, having brief embodiments on these upper

These embodiments are not physical. Do not view them as similar
to ours here. They may be brief, fleeting, or perhaps not so
brief. For all we know, they may be on the plane of the
life-atom or even non-physical. They will take some form on the
upper Globes for a time. On these Globes, we pick up substances
and elements belonging to our constitution from these Globes.

The entity has to come down into embodiment on Globe D with the
elements and substances of Globes A, B, and C within its
constitution. As part of the human life-wave, it has already
lived and evolved on these Globes four times. In round the
first, round the second, round the third, and round the fourth,
it was on Globes A, B, and C. As part of the human life-wave, it
is now on Globe D.

An entity has many karmic connections with these upper Globes.
These are not fleeting connections. In the human life-wave on
previous Rounds and in this Round already, he was centered on
these Globes for a long time. Now, he embodies as a human on
Globe D. Therefore, his embodiments on the other Globes are

The human embodies himself on Globe D and eventually dies. After
the second death in the Kamaloka of Globe D, he enters into
Devachan. It is a spiritual condition that we might call
ecstasy. His godlike parent, the Spiritual Monad carries him
within its bosom or encompassing consciousness. As he ascends
through the higher Globes of the chain, his devachanic sleep
within the Monad becomes more complete.

In death, the human entity leaves the planetary chain by going
through the upper Globes. There is no other way. Entering
sleep, he does precisely the same thing. Do we have any
embodiments on those outgoing Globes? Yes, but picture them as
fleeting, rapid, without human self-consciousness.

In THE MAHATMA LETTERS, there is an extensive letter on Rounds
and Races. It speaks of many incarnations, all in divisions of
sevens or some power of seven. Would these fleeting embodiments
figure in their mathematics? Before reaching D, would the
manifestation we have on Globe A, B, and C count as embodiments?
No. The explanation there refers to full-limit, full-sized
embodiments of the entity on whichever Globe the life-wave
centers on.

In the Fourth Round, when the life-wave centered on Globe A, B,
then C, the human entity had many incarnations on the respective
Globe. He had lives in the various Root Races belonging to the
Globe. The time for life on the higher Globes is in the past.
For millions of years, the center of gravity of our evolution has
been on Globe D. For millions of years more, the dynamic growth
and experience will remain here. Then the whole life-wave will
pass onto Globe E. When that has happened, our Globe D
embodiments will be fleeting.

Why do we humans seem to be always on Globe D? We are not always
on this Globe. We are here for a period of time only, the last
few million years and a few million years more. That is just a
week or month in the soul's evolution.

These embodiments on the superior Globes are not taking place
during the nine-month gestation of a new physical body on Globe
D. The Reincarnating Ego is still in its devachanic sleep within
the Monad, which has not reached Globe D at all. Conception and
the beginning of gestation have not happened on Globe D because
the human has not contacted the Globe yet. It is not here at
all. It is on the Descending Arc somewhere. Descending through
these Globes, the Monad carries the Reincarnating Ego to Globe D
in its bosom. That Ego is almost completely in devachanic sleep.

The Monad will reach Globe D eventually. The Reincarnating Ego
will contact the particular life-atom that will become the center
for its conception and growth. For a long time after birth, the
child will still be halfway in a dream. Until it starts talking,
taking a five-mile walk, it is still not out of Devachan.

The Ego issues out of the devachanic condition gradually while
the new body grows. The monadic self guides this process of
gestation. The Christians would call it his Guardian Angel. The
incarnating ego cannot help guide the process because it is still
in devachanic sleep. One's own inner godhood guides this
process, which builds the new brain and nervous system.

Issuing out of Devachan, the Ego pours its life energies into the
form eventually. The greater the intensity of pouring, the
wider-awake the individual becomes. Some reach adulthood
mentally in early boyhood and girlhood. They are advanced. The
less-advanced people reach adulthood later. In some cases,
people go through life dazed and without self-consciousness.
Curiously, they are not altogether out of Devachan their entire
life, an unfortunate state of affairs.

As we pass through the Globes on our way out of the planetary
chain, we leave on the Globes the corresponding essences of our
constitution belonging to these Globes. As we go down through
the descending Globes into incarnation, we pick them up. How can
we pick up on Globes A, B, and C what we left on E, F, and G?
Everything is in circulation. Everything moves around. Nothing
stays in any one place too long. There is a circulation through
the Globes of the various currents of life-atoms as well.

There will always be a physical embodiment, even in the Seventh
Round. The same is true of the other parts of us. In that last
Round, they will still exist. We will have completely purified
and raised them to its nth degree of spirituality. Our physical
vehicle is going to be fully and perfectly spiritual instead of
the imperfect thing that it is now. The same is true of other
parts of our nature.

Become familiar with these thoughts. Think them over in the
quiet when opportunity arises. As you do, they become more
logical, systematic, organized, and sensible. We now face what
appears to add a complication to a formerly complex picture.
This only seems so because we are unfamiliar with these thoughts.
Dwelling on them more, they make more sense, the complexity
dissolving into a pattern of great beauty, of magnificent

Now we come to a further complication. What incarnates on Globe
D? The Monad does. The sevenfold, compound human constitution
has a part having its habitat throughout the planetary chain. We
call it the Intellectual Monad. Also called the Chain Monad, it
is at the state of evolution making it at home throughout all the

It has twelve rays or twelve subordinate monadic centers. Each
is for one of the Globes of the planetary chain. These twelve
children Monads, twelve rays, or twelve essences all derive from
the Chain Monad. Each has a corresponding magnetic relation to
one of the twelve Globes of the chain.

The man on earth is the Globe D ray of the Chain Monad. That
Monad has one such subordinate ray on each of the other Globes as
well. We say the reincarnating entity takes brief embodiments on
Globes A, B, and C on its way down to Globe D. What we mean is
that on each Globe on the way down, the aspect of the Monad
belonging to that Globe briefly embodies. Likewise, after death
as the entity goes up the chain through Globes E, F, and G, the
aspect belonging to those Globes embodies. The Globe D entity
does not embody on the other Globes. Students have difficulty
with this point. Be careful since this may seem confusing.

These twelve children come from the Chain Monad. That Monad is
our parent. It is at home throughout the entire planetary chain.
We are one-twelfth aspect of the Chain Monad. Like a family of
twelve children, we have one common parent in the planetary Chain
Monad. While the Globe D child is alive, the other children are
active to some extent. Their activity and evolution are
relatively latent, because the whole center of gravity is on
Globe D now.

It would not be correct to say that they are inactive.
Everything evolves all the time. The impetus of dynamic
evolution is limited to Globe D as far as our hierarchy is
concerned at present. It has not always been so. It will not
always be that way. This is obvious because the life-wave moves
from one Globe to the next. I do not want to complicate this
more. It is complicated enough. I just want to point out the

We can say that when the individual dies here he will pass
through the upper Globes of the chain. He does have a fleeting
embodiment there. It is correct provided you realize it is
another aspect of his consciousness that embodies there, not the
Globe D aspect.

When the life-wave leaves Globe D and enters Globe E, the Globe D
ray goes into a state of dormancy as the Globe E ray becomes
central. The E aspect of the twelvefold entity now predominates.

Would it be accurate to speak of the Globe E aspects having THEIR
lives, just as we Globe D aspects currently have OUR lives? No,
this would be somewhat inaccurate. Consider a partial
illustration. Picture a wheel with twelve segments, each with a
different color. At various times, one of the twelve colors
predominates, shining brighter than the others do. Eventually,
all twelve have had a turn to shine brighter than the rest. They
are the twelve aspects of the combined consciousness of the Chain

To avoid creating confusion, I will say little more on this.
Having been men and women on Globe D, are any of us in this room
ever going to manifest as men and women on Globe E? Yes, we will.
Will that be as male and female? In certain stages of global
evolution, the division into polarities will exist in some form.
It does not have to be identical with what we have here.

What is the "we" that I mention? It is the human
self-consciousness. It is not the personality or the lower part
of us. It is that which is today self-conscious, something that
we cannot say of the cat, dog, or horse, although they stand on
the borderline. What can we postulate of us as human beings? We
know that we are self-consciousness. Our human nature is that
center within us that has unfolded consciousness to the point of
recognizing ourselves. It is consciousness turned upon itself or

We speak of the transfer of consciousness from Globe D to Globe
E. If the Globe D consciousness exists and then goes into
dormancy, what is it that passes onto the next Globe? Picture
again the wheel with twelve spokes. Another colored spoke is
coming into operation at that time.

Look upon our human consciousness of today. That individual in
us is twelvefold. Even our self-consciousness is twelvefold. We
know a degree of self-consciousness of a Globe D type now. We
will become aware of self-consciousness of a Globe E type
eventually. It is the same entity, but another aspect of it.

Consider another illustration along physical lines, imperfect but
having value. You live in a house. A certain type of
consciousness identifies you. You have a name. No one confuses
you with anybody else. You are individual. You are not always
living the same aspect of your individuality.

When in the kitchen preparing a meal, you are not a scholar.
Your consciousness works along a certain keynote. When in your
den working on important business matters or literary works,
another aspect of your consciousness is at work. When in the
living room entertaining guests, you are neither the scholar nor
the man in the kitchen. When at the end of the day in your
bedroom, you enter into an entirely different aspect of your
individual self-consciousness, different from the rest.

Within the same day, you manifest differing aspects of your
individual consciousness. This shows it is compound in
constitution, perhaps differing so widely that you may be
practically unrecognizable when changing location and keynote of
consciousness. This illustration is not a perfect, but has

An intuitive way to put the circulation of consciousness through
the Globes is to picture the wind of the spirit. Picture leaves
on a tree. As the wind passes through the tree, each leaf
quivers in turn, becoming predominant for a time. There is a
passage of a spiritual wind, of a spiritual essence or effluvia
or current. Each of the twelve rays of the Chain Monad stir into
life in its turn.

In subjects like this, practically everything said arouses new
questions. We wonder what about this or what about that.
Invariably, my teacher had his students dwell on understanding
the essentials or skeletal outline. He filled in the details
when his students had really understood and grasped the main
idea. Naturally, in discussing these things today, we are far
ahead of just an outline. We have entered into some detail.
That is where our difficulty lies.

There are entities of all kinds, human, superhuman, animal,
vegetable, mineral, and elemental. Regardless of kingdom, the
only way in which any can enter into the chain of Globes is
through its upper Globes. One cannot jump into any Globe
directly. There is no such entry. The only way to exit is by
the Ascending Arc, passing through the upper Globes in

There are all sorts of analogies and repercussions to this idea.
Analogies are really repercussions. A man draws a certain note
on a violin and shatters a glass. We can call that a
repercussion. We can also call it an analogy. By what means do
we reproduce the analogous vibratory rate over there also? We do
so by means of repercussion. There is a tremendous science back
of that, one sorely disregarded by modern science.

Modern science knows some of the laws of repercussion but does
not use them. Consider when scientists explode one of their atom
bombs. They should realize this is going to produce
repercussions. They would realize this if they would put their
minds to it and allowed themselves to think more freely than
their theories permit. These repercussions are not merely noise
but rather the arousing of overtones and undertones in aspects of
nature's forces. Scientists do not know exactly where and how
this happens. That is where they prove themselves blind,
ignorant children playing with fire.

The life-waves of the planetary chain begin in the upper Globes.
They circle down, center for millions of years on every Globe,
and then circle up the Ascending Arc. That constitutes one
Round. They do that seven times and then the chain ends.
Subordinate to the evolution of life-waves as a whole, there are
many other life processes. They follow the same route on the
corresponding hierarchical planes. We know this by analogy.

On any particular scale of being, on any particular plane,
everything that evolves uses the same route or channel. The
life-waves pass down the Descending Arc and up the Ascending Arc.
The minor circulation of one human incarnation does the same. It
is a process of embodiment downward. One strikes bottom where a
full life period of physical incarnation takes place. Then there
is the channeling of the Ego back into the spiritual world via
the Ascending Arc.

Take a bigger scale of being. There are the Outer Rounds. We
have discussed them but little so far. On them, there are
life-waves of a greater cycle, of a greater sweep. According to
the same pattern, the life-waves pass through a number of
planetary chains. I am not saying what kind of a chain the earth
is, whether first, second, fourth, fifth, or twenty-fifth. It is
one of a chain of chains. The pattern of Descending and
Ascending Arcs prevails here too.

Another aspect involves the element principles of our
constitution. There is a circulation of life-atoms within the
full-fledged twelvefold constitution of a man. This is obviously
not composed of life-waves. There are not human beings
circulating within him. There are life-atoms going through a
Descending Arc down to the physical body and then up an Ascending
Arc into the spiritual reaches of his constitution.

This idea has an extremely practical application. Suppose
someone has indulged in evil thinking. It was selfish, greedy,
inharmonious, and unbalanced with nature's laws. He has indulged
in that thinking, giving embodiment to many mental life-atoms
impregnated with certain twisted and distorted energy on his
mental plane.

Eventually, these life-atoms are going to circle down into the
lower parts of his constitution. Wherever they go, they will
engender disharmonious vortices of force. Reaching the astral
constitution, they engender astral disharmonies. Reaching down
to the physical plane, they engender disease.

How long is it going to take? Will it happen within the same life
or take several lifetimes to happen? I do not know. Eventually,
what one has generated on the higher planes will circle down to
the lower planes. For ultimate purification, it will then go up

If that individual indulged in and built a wonderful trend of
ideas and feelings, those will manifest eventually too. They
will show themselves on the physical plane as great joy,
happiness, abundance, or fortune. Something will accrue to the
benefit of that individual and others. Why is this? Everything
follows the same pattern, the same analogical channeling through
the various planes. This is true whether they are the planes of
the human constitution, the planes of the planetary chain, or the
planes of the solar system on which the various chains are

Consider this and realize that these abstruse teachings have
practical application in our daily life.

Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application